Furnishers of labor or materials to the owner, contractor, at least the first- and second-tier subs, architect or authorized agent. There is no apparent limit to the remoteness of a subcontractor; all will have lien rights. Suppliers to suppliers, however, do not have lien rights. [376.010, 376.075; Brock v. Pilot Corp., 234 S.W.3d 381 (Ky.App.,2007); Woodson Bend, Inc. v. Masters’ Supply, Inc., 571 S.W.2d 95 (Ky.App. 1978); Hightower v. Bailey, 108 Ky. 198, 49 L.R.A. 255 (1942)] But note that lien amount cannot exceed the contract price between the owner and general. Note that engineers, landscape architects, architects, land surveyors, and, in certain situations, real estate brokers, may also have a lien, if they contract directly with the owner or the owner’s agent. They are required to give final notice, but no preliminary notice. The details for their claims are not set out in this summary. Note that per case law, a supplier to a supplier has no lien rights, but a supplier to a remote subcontractor, where the materials are delivered off site, will have lien rights. [376.010 and case law; 376.075; Hightower v. Bailey, 56 S.W. 147 ( Ky. 1900)]
NOTE that where subcontractor claimant fails to timely file a lien, the sub may be allowed to bring a claim for unjust enrichment. [Brown Sprinkler Corp. v. Somerset-Pulaski County Development Foundation, Inc., 335 S.W.3d 455 (Ky.App.2010)]