LIEN:
Contractors, subs, and furnishers of labor or material and equipment to owner, contractors, or 1st– or 2nd-tier subs. Registered professional engineers, registered land surveyors, and registered architects also have lien rights. Suppliers to suppliers are not protected. Note that unionized employees may, in some cases, be able to collect for vacation pay or other benefits provided under a collective bargaining agreement. NOTE, HOWEVER, that where a no-lien provision is part of a single-unit residential construction contract, and the contract is timely recorded, claimants will not have lien rights. See the ‘can lien rights be waived’ section, below. Per case law, a construction manager who provides only supervisory or management services, and not labor or materials, is not entitled to a mechanic’s lien. Activities such as on-site supervision, coordination of work, cleanup, protection and security for materials are all considered supervisory activities and are not lienable, however, services for decontamination and hazardous waste removal and disposal are covered. [32-28-3-1, 32-28-11-1; In re Bentz Metal Products Co., Inc., 253 F.3d 283 (7th Cir. 2001); Kinney Elec. Mfg. Co. v. Modern Elec. Co., 149 N.W.2d 69 (1967); Murdock Constr. Management, Inc. v. Eastern Star Missionary Baptist Church, Inc., 766 N.E. 2d 759 (Ind. App. 2002); Cho v. Purdue Research Foundation, 803 N.E.2d 1161 (App. 2004); Midwest Biohazard Services, LLC v. Rodgers, 893 N.E.2d 1074 (Ind. App.,2008)]
CLAIM AGAINST CONTRACT FUNDS:
Subcontractors, laborers, journeymen, lessors of equipment or tools, or materials suppliers. There is no explicit limit as to tier of subcontractor or supplier, and in at least one case, a supplier to a sub-sub-contractor was allowed to bring a claim against the contract funds owed by the owner to the general contractor, regardless of whether anything was still owed to the sub-subcontractor. Nonetheless, suppliers to suppliers are not covered. [32-28-3-9; Gibson-Lewis, LLC v. Teachers Credit Union, 854 N.E.2d 392 (Ind. App. 2006); R.T. Moore Co., Inc. v. Slant/Fin Corp., 966 N.E.2d 636 (Ind.App.2012)]